Is the Google’s Yo-Yo Effect the Evidence of a New Algo ? :: Blog-O-Sphere News

November 17, 2008 | Leave a Comment

Posted by ActiveMind

I decided to write this post because starting from April ‘08 to today, there have been more and more frequent cases of yo-yoing SERPs.

But it’s not the first evidence of Google’s yo-yo on a big scale. Here in Italy Michele De Capitani realized and studied Google’s yo-yo effect from 2007 and called it "sine waves". In 3 articles Michele explains very well how he discovered this destructive effect by monitoring different Google data centers for different websites.

The initial idea was that previous sine waves and those of March 2007 were the effect of a deep spam check and a method to clean the Google index. But after Google’s Phrase Rank introduction and next sine waves of July 2007 this idea was abandoned. Between 2007 and 2008 in Google Groups and other specialized resources in the web you could more frequently read of strange behaviour of web pages: up and down in the ranking with differences, also of many positions, and these weren’t a -950 over optimization penalty.

But first of all… how can you realize your site is yo-yoing?The most common effect is a sudden and huge loss of traffic. Yes, you can lost up to 90% of your traffic from one day to the next and your site can still remain in fluctuation for months. Your site will be visible in SERPs only for some keywords and only for short periods (days or hours). Then your site will disappear from high rankings and will be positioned lower and lower until it will be "lost."

Sine waves are related to single keywords and queries. So if you use a good web analytics software or Google Analytics, the simplest method to realize if a keyword is yo-yoing is this: check the keyword traffic for an extended period of time, like one year. If the keyword is fluctuating you’ll see large peaks in your graphics. Sometimes after months your site could return in the SERPs, taking its original rankings even if you’ve done nothing. But many times your site could remain in the waves and continue to fluctuate.

Nowadays it’s not clear what is/are the factor(s) that start a yo-yo effect. After analyzing different cases, we realize some common elements, like:

  • All kind of sites can fluctuate, such as blogs and websites of different dimensions (from small to big portals)
  • Problems of near duplicates
  • Problems of network sites in the same machine or in the same subnet network IP addresses
  • Problems of websites hosted in countries outside the TLD domain suffix
  • Backlinks with the same anchor repeated many times
  • Intensive activities of Google’s spiders in the site

The latest big fluctuation we observed started on August 19th and its effects are still active.

So… is it the effect of a new Google algo tested in previous years and is now in production at 100%? Or are the fluctuations of the yoyo-effect sine waves the result of a glitch or problem of damping factor? I believe the yo-yo is a new algo completely introduced in production by Google just before the Dewey update….and what do you think about it ?

Do you like this post? Yes No

More SEO News…. (CLICK HERE)
Tags:

Please be sure to visit our new Social Blog Network, as well as our Social Bookmark Site. Both offer services for free!
Get you latest SEO news fix at AutoPrimeMedia.com!

Search Engine Optimization is not an exact science. It takes lot’s of work and research. Trial and Error. Read through our posts here and try to learn from our experience. We offer some of our insight… news and comment. Please feel free to share your thoughts, and ideas. The site does allow "follows" so post your links.

Posted by admin | Filed Under Uncategorized 

The Art of Pitching - What’s Wrong With Link Building Email Requests? :: Web Optimization Techniques

November 17, 2008 | Leave a Comment

We’ve all, at some point, received the “request-for-a-link” email.

Such emails are useless, on a number of levels, the main reason being that the offer is lousy. However, such emails also tend to get the pitch wrong, so further limit the chances of getting the link. Getting the pitch right - the way the offer is described - is a bit of an art.

I’ve been looking back through the emails I’ve received and there are common characteristics displayed in those I ignored, and those I responded to.

There are two aspects common to all such emails, the offer and the pitch.

The Offer

The offer must be compelling. No matter how good the pitch, if the offer doesn’t advantage the recipient in some way, then the sender is unlikely to receive a response.

Take, for example, the PR offer.

I receive a lot of these. They don’t get read. Why? There’s no advantage for me in doing so. There is advantage for the company that wants free coverage, of course, but not me. Unless the information is ground-breaking, and hasn’t been circulated widely in the public domain, then the typical PR email “offer” is very poor. The offer is essentially this: “give us your time and effort for nothing so we can advance our cause”

Well, no. No I won’t :)

But lets say the offer is to my advantage. Either I’m receiving some genuinely useful information, a good opportunity, or a good incentive. It can still be let down by the quality of the pitch.

The Pitch

Here is an email Aaron received recently:

Subject: About an Advertisement on Your Blog

Hellow.
I’ve recently created a software for automated social bookmarking.

Just wanted to ask, if it is possible to order a post about our tool on your blog, written by you ?
You don’t even need to install and actually test the software if you don’t want to, just mention that there is something out there that is worth using for seo purposes.
Here is a website: (removed)

Thanks.

There are a few obvious problems in terms of both the offer and the pitch.

  • “Hellow”. The very first word is misspelled. This is unprofessional.
  • Does not include the recipients name. It’s not personal.
  • Asks about advertising, then demands coverage, with no transition. What’s in it for me? Where’s the incentive?
  • Asks us to post about the software without trying it. Again, why would we do that? Our credibility would be at stake, for starters.
  • Domain misspelled. You’ll have to take my word on that one, but it was :)
  • Does not have the senders name in the email. Again, unprofessional.
  • Their domain is a scrolling sales letter with no other content. Why would we recommend our readers, who tend to be very web-savvy, to such a site? We’d lose credibility.

Not only is the offer a poor one, but we can’t take the pitch seriously either. It could have worked if they’d thought a little bit more about the offer, and pitched correctly.

How To Pitch An Email

1. Make It Personal

Imagine a telephone call where the caller launched straight into their message, but with time spent on social niceties. Even telemarketers make some effort to establish rapport.

The same goes with email. You need to know who you’re writing to and address that person by name. Read their About Us page, read their site, Google them, get to know them. It can be a good idea to make contact with them, and build a rapport, some time before making your request for a favor. Try to pay it forward. Give them something first.

It’s also a good idea to clearly outline a connection you have with the recipient, if such a fact isn’t already established. For example, “I read your article “SEOmoz’s Linkscape: Why the Backlash is Overblown” and wanted to ask you a question….” or “I was talking to a friend of yours, Aaron Wall, and he suggested I…..”

2. Keep It Professional

Hi Arren,

I waas wanting too no if you would link to my site?

Spelling and grammar matter. No one expects William Shakespeare, but poor spelling and grammar screams “unprofessional”. An obvious exception is when you know someone well. The better you know someone, the less the technical aspects of communication tend to matter.

3. Tone

If you don’t know someone well, it is best to use a professional tone. Too conversational can come over as “not serious”, especially in email correspondence. Remember, it’s not like dealing face-to-face, where nuance, inflection, expression and gestures become important signifiers of meaning.

So keep it clean, clear, precise and professional. Be particularly careful with humor. What sounds like a joke to you may get lost in translation, especially if the person you’re emailing is from a different country.

If in doubt, play it straight.

4. Message Title

So much depends on the title.

Put yourself in the recipients shoes. Like you, they’re probably busy. They’re focused on their own stuff. They might have an inbox that is full to bursting, and they’re feeling a little guilty about not clearing it out. One more message is just one more problem they must deal with.

Then your message arrives.

In this context, how do you make sure your message desirable?

The trick with email is to make the title personal. Relate it directly to the recipient in some way. Arouse curiosity, praise people, describe a benefit, or pose a direct question. But put a personal spin on it.

A lot of email marketing strategy gets this wrong, particularly in relation to benefits. Titles loaded with benefits, such as “”Do You Hate Your Job? Discover Seven Secrets…” will be viewed as spam. Titles like that may work if you are in the spam business, but they are highly unlikely to work anywhere else. If you do use benefit statements, then try to personalize them.

5. What’s In It For The Recipient

This is possibly the most important aspect in getting the recipient to act.

Outline the benefit to the recipient, and do so before they switch off.

Be concise.

Too lengthy, and it’s unlikely the recipient will read to the end. A big block of text can be very off-putting. The first contact should be brief. You can go into detail latter. Think of the first email contact as a covering letter.

Try to offer them something of value. A discount code, a free trial, a free product. It should be something of real value.

Ok, so let’s try and rewrite the email, using the guidelines. Note: the intent of the original email was a little ambiguous. It sounded as if the person who wrote it wanted a pay-per-post deal. However, SEOBook doesn’t do those types of deals, so I’ve refocused on how it should be pitched, if the writer had bothered to first research SEOBook.com’s editorial policy :)

New SEO Software Your Readers Might Like

Hi Aaron,

I’m a loyal reader of SEOBook.com, and I’ve written a piece of software that you and your readers might be interested in.

The software automates social bookmarking.

You can use the software to help build links and increase traffic to your site. If you’d like to try it out, here is a link to a free copy. I’ve included a recent case study showing how we took a site from 1,000 visitors to 4,000 visitors in less than a week.

I’d be very interested in hearing any feedback you may have.

Kind regards,

Joe Emailer

acme.com

Not perfect, but it only took one minute to write. I’m sure we can all agree that it is an improvement on the first one.

Aaron might even have answered it….

More SEO News…. (CLICK HERE)
Tags:

Please be sure to visit our new Social Blog Network, as well as our Social Bookmark Site. Both offer services for free!
Get you latest SEO news fix at AutoPrimeMedia.com!

Search Engine Optimization is not an exact science. It takes lot’s of work and research. Trial and Error. Read through our posts here and try to learn from our experience. We offer some of our insight… news and comment. Please feel free to share your thoughts, and ideas. The site does allow "follows" so post your links.

Posted by admin | Filed Under Uncategorized 

How To Avoid Overdoing the Curiosity-Factor In Your Headline :: Blog-O-Sphere News

November 10, 2008 | Leave a Comment

If you’re going to write a headline, you want the headline to attract. And one of the many elements of attraction is ‘curiosity.’
The more curious your headline, the more you have a chance of the reader stopping long enough to get interested. But hey, in the desire to write a really curious headline, we inevitably […]
More SEO News…. (CLICK HERE)
Tags:

Please be sure to visit our new Social Blog Network, as well as our Social Bookmark Site. Both offer services for free!
Get you latest SEO news fix at AutoPrimeMedia.com!

Search Engine Optimization is not an exact science. It takes lot’s of work and research. Trial and Error. Read through our posts here and try to learn from our experience. We offer some of our insight… news and comment. Please feel free to share your thoughts, and ideas. The site does allow "follows" so post your links.

Posted by admin | Filed Under Uncategorized